Referencias del capítulo 4

  1. Adamopoulos, T., y Restuccia, D. (2022). Geography and agricultural productivity: Cross-country evidence from micro plot-level data. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(4), article 4.
  2. AIE. (2021). Is carbon capture too expensive?https://www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive
  3. AIE. (2023a). Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage
  4. AIE. (2023b). Emissions from oil and gas operations in net zero transitions [Dataset]. París: Agencia Internacional de la Energía. https://www.iea.org/reports/emissions-from-oil-and-gas-operations-in-net-zero-transitions
  5. AIE. (2023c). Global Methane Tracker 2023. https:// http://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2023
  6. AIE. (2023d). Latin America Energy Outlook 2023 [Dataset]. París: Agencia Internacional de la Energía. https://www.iea.org/reports/latin-america-energy-outlook-2023
  7. AIE. (2023e). Unlocking Smart Grid Opportunities in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies. https://www.iea.org/reports/unlocking-smart-grid-opportunities-in-emerging-markets-and-developing-economies
  8. AIE. (2024). Energy Statistics. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics
  9. Alix-Garcia, J., Sims, K. R. E., Orozco-Olvera, V., Costica, L., Fernandez Medina, J. D., Romo-Monroy, S., y Pagiola, S. (2019). Can Environmental Cash Transfers Reduce Deforestation and Improve Social Outcomes? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of Mexico’s National Program (2011-2014). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 8707, article 8707. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3317966
  10. Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), article 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
  11. Allub, L., Álvarez, F., Alves, G., Cont, W., Juncosa, F., Odriozola, J. (2024). Energías Renovadas: Transición energética justa para el desarrollo sostenible (RED;). Caracas: CAF. Retrieved from https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2248
  12. Alpízar, F., Madrigal, R., Alvarado, I., Brenes Vega, E., Camhi, A., Maldonado, J. H., Marco, J., Martínez, A., Pacay, E., y Watson, G. (2020). Mainstreaming of Natural Capital and Biodiversity into Planning and Decision-Making: Cases from Latin America and the Caribbean. IDB Publications. https://doi.org/10.18235/0002667
  13. Arreaza, A., Barril, D., Condor, R., Díaz, G., Perelmuter, N., Schliesser, R., Toledo, M., y Guevara, O. (2023). Desastres climáticos en América Latina y el Caribe: El rol de las inversiones en infraestructura resiliente y las políticas de adaptación. Documentos de trabajo en políticas públicas CAF. https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2156
  14. Ayres, I., Raseman, S., y Shih, A. (2013). Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(5), article 5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ews020
  15. Banco Mundial. (2023a). PIB (US$ a precios constantes de 2010) [Dataset]. Indicadores del Desarrollo Mundial.
  16. Banco Mundial. (2023b). Población total [Dataset]. Indicadores del Desarrollo Mundial.
  17. Baragwanath, K., y Bayi, E. (2020). Collective property rights reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(34), article 34. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917874117
  18. Barril, D., Lopez, O., y Perelmuter, N. (2023). Sequía amenaza al sur del continente. Documento no publicado. CAF.
  19. Blackman, A. (2015). Strict versus mixed-use protected areas: Guatemala’s Maya Biosphere Reserve. Ecological Economics, 112, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.009
  20. Blackman, A., Epanchin-Niell, R., Siikamäki, J., y Velez-Lopez, D. (2014). Biodiversity Conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Prioritizing Policies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848433
  21. Blackman, A., y Rivera, J. (2011). Producer-Level Benefits of Sustainability Certification. Conservation Biology, 25(6), article 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01774.x
  22. Block, S., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., y Wendling, Z. A. (2024). Environmental Performance Index [Dataset]. Yale Center for Environmental Law y Policy.
  23. Brassiolo, P., Estrada, R., Vicuña, S., Odriozola, J., Toledo, M., Juncosa, F., Fajardo, G., Schargrodsky, E. (2023). Desafíos globales, soluciones regionales: América Latina y el Caribe frente a la crisis climática y de biodiversidad. Distrito Capital: CAF- banco de desarrollo de América Latina y el Caribe. Retrieved from https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2089
  24. Cárdenas, M., y Orozco, S. (2022). Climate Mitigation in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Primer on Transition Costs, Risks, and Financing. Center on Global Energy Policy. Columbia/SIPA. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/publications/climate-mitigation-latin-america-and-caribbean-primer-transition-costs-risks-and-financing/
  25. Carrero, G. C., Walker, R. T., Simmons, C. S., y Fearnside, P. M. (2022). Land grabbing in the Brazilian Amazon: Stealing public land with government approval. Land Use Policy, 120, 106133. 
  26. Caruso, G. D. (2017). The legacy of natural disasters: The intergenerational impact of 100 years of disasters in Latin America. Journal of Development Economics, 127, 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.03.007
  27. Casey, J. A., Gemmill, A., Karasek, D., Ogburn, E. L., Goin, D. E., y Morello-Frosch, R. (2018). Increase in fertility following coal and oil power plant retirements in California. Environmental Health, 17(1), article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0388-8
  28. Casey, J. A., Karasek, D., Ogburn, E. L., Goin, D. E., Dang, K., Braveman, P. A., y Morello-Frosch, R. (2018). Retirements of Coal and Oil Power Plants in California: Association With Reduced Preterm Birth Among Populations Nearby. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187(8), article 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy110
  29. Chancel, L. (2022). Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019. Nature Sustainability, 5(11), article 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00955-z
  30. Clark, V. R., y Herzog, H. J. (2014). Can “stranded” Fossil Fuel Reserves Drive CCS Deployment? Energy Procedia, 63, 7261-7271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.762
  31. Climate Action Tracker. (2023). Warming Projections Global Update—December 2023.
  32. Climate Watch. (2023). Historical GHG Emissions [Dataset]. https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ ghg-emissions?end_year=2020&start_year=1990
  33. Climate Watch. (2024). Net-Zero Tracker [Dataset]. 
  34. COP 10 del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. (2010). Metas Aichi. https://www.cbd.int/undb/media/factsheets/undb-factsheet-sp-es.pdf
  35. Costa, D. L., y Kahn, M. E. (2013). Energy Conservation “Nudges” and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), article 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12011
  36. Dafforn, K. A., Glasby, T. M., Airoldi, L., Rivero, N. K., Mayer-Pinto, M., y Johnston, E. L. (2015). Marine urbanization: An ecological framework for designing multifunctional artificial structures. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(2), article 2. https://doi.org/10.1890/140050
  37. De La Mata, D., Berniell, L., Schargrodsky, E., Álvarez, F., Arreaza, A., & Alves, G. (2022). Desigualdades heredadas. El rol de las habilidades, el empleo y la riqueza en las oportunidades de las nuevas generaciones. Caracas. Retrieved from https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1981
  38. Digital Economy Report 2023. (2023).
  39. EIA. (2020). Residential Energy Consumption Survey [Dataset]. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/ residential/data/2020/
  40. EIA. (2022). Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)—U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php
  41. EMDAT. (2022). Georeferenced Emergency Events Database [Dataset]. https://public.emdat.be/
  42. EUDR. (2023). Reglamento de la UE 2023/1115 sobre Productos Libres de Deforestación (EUDR). 
  43. Eurostat. (2022). Ambiente y Energía [Dataset]. Unión Europea. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
  44. Fell, H., y Morrill, M. S. (2024). The Impact of Wind Energy on Air Pollution and Emergency Department Visits. Environmental and Resource Economics, 87(1), article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00825-y
  45. Ferreira, A. (2023). Amazon deforestation: Drivers, damages, and policies. Políticas para la respuesta al cambio climático y preservación de la biodiversidad. Documento de trabajo. CAF.
  46. Flanders Marine Institute. (2019). Maritime Boundaries Geodatabase: Maritime Boundaries and Exclusive Economic Zones (200NM) [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.14284/386
  47. Frank, E. (2024). The economic impacts of ecosystem disruptions: Costs from substituting biological pest control. Science, 385(6713), article 6713. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg0344
  48. Frank, E., Wang, S., Wang, X., Wang, Q., y You, Y. (2024). Campaigning for Extinction: Eradication of Sparrows and the Great Famine in China. Working Paper. https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f196680.pdf
  49. Frank, E., y Oremus, K. (2023). Regulating Biological Resources: Lessons from Marine Fisheries in the United States. SSRN Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4445576
  50. Frank, E., y Sudarshan, A. (2024). The Social Costs of Keystone Species Collapse: Evidence From The Decline of Vultures in India. American Economic Review, 114(10), article 10.
  51. Friedlingstein, P., O’Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Bakker, D. C. E., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Anthoni, P., … Zheng, B. (2023). Global Carbon Budget 2023. Earth System Science Data, 15(12), article 12. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
  52. Gauthier, N., Ellis, E., y Klein Goldewijk, K. (2021). Anthromes 12K DGG (V1) Full Dataset [Dataset]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3H3AK
  53. Gómez García, R., Vignati, F., Ginatta, G., y Rodríguez, M. del C. (2022). Observatorio CAF GEF de buenas prácticas y lecciones aprendidas (No. Boletín n.° 1; Número Boletín n.° 1). Observatorio de la Iniciativa Latinoamericana y del Caribe para el Mercado del Carbono (ILACC). CAF. https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1927
  54. Gross, S. (2020). The challenge of decarbonizing heavy transport. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-challenge-of-decarbonizing-heavy-transport/
  55. Heal, G. M. (2020). The Economic Case for Protecting Biodiversity (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 3714455; Número 3714455). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3714455
  56. Heery, E. C., Hoeksema, B. W., Browne, N. K., Reimer, J. D., Ang, P. O., Huang, D., Friess, D. A., Chou, L. M., Loke, L. H. L., Saksena-Taylor, P., Alsagoff, N., Yeemin, T., Sutthacheep, M., Vo, S. T., Bos, A. R., Gumanao, G. S., Syed Hussein, M. A., Waheed, Z., Lane, D. J. W., … Todd, P. A. (2018). Urban coral reefs: Degradation and resilience of hard coral assemblages in coastal cities of East and Southeast Asia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 135, 654-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.041
  57. Hubbard, T. N. (2003). Information, decisions, and productivity: On-board computers and capacity utilization in trucking. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1328-1353.
  58. Ibañez, M., y Blackman, A. (2016). Is Eco-Certification a Win–Win for Developing Country Agriculture? Organic Coffee Certification in Colombia. World Development, 82, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.004
  59. IDEAL. (2022). Ideal 2022: Energía, agua y salud para un mejor medio ambiente (Infraestructura en el Desarrollo Integral de América Latina (IDEAL)). CAF. https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1980
  60. IPBES. (2016). The Assessment Report on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production. S.G. Potts, V. L. Imperatriz-Fonseca, and H. T. Ngo (eds). IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3402856
  61. IPCC. (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Preparado por el Grupo de Trabajo III del Panel Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre Cambio Climático (Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H. C., Loos, M. y Meyer, L. A., eds.); Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/carbon-dioxide-capture-and-storage/
  62. IPCC. (2021). Figure SPM.10 in IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/summary-for-policymakers/figure-spm-10
  63. IPCC. (2022a). AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPC Sixth Assessment Report. Working Group III. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/
  64. IPCC. (2022b). AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPC Sixth Assessment Report. Working Group II. https://www.ipcc.ch/working-group/wg2/
  65. Izquierdo-Tort, S., Jayachandran, S., y Saavedra, S. (2024). Redesigning payments for ecosystem services to increase cost-effectiveness. Universidad del Rosario Documentos de Trabajo, 21022, article 21022. 
  66. Jayachandran, S. (2023). The inherent trade-off between the environmental and anti-poverty goals of payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Research Letters, 18(2), article. 2. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/acb1a7/meta
  67. Jones, B. A., y McDermott, S. M. (2018). Health Impacts of Invasive Species Through an Altered Natural Environment: Assessing Air Pollution Sinks as a Causal Pathway. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71(1), article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0135-6.
  68. Kere, E. N., Choumert, J., Combes Motel, P., Combes, J. L., Santoni, O., y Schwartz, S. (2017). Addressing Contextual and Location Biases in the Assessment of Protected Areas Effectiveness on Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazônia. Ecological Economics, 136, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.018
  69. Latinobarómetro. (2018). Latinobarómetro—Opinión Pública Latinoamericana [Dataset]. https://www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jsp
  70. MEPC. (2023). Resolution MEPC 377(80). 2023 IMO STRATEGY ON REDUCTION OF GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/annex/MEPC%2080/Annex%2015.pdf
  71. Microsoft. (2024). Environmental Sustainability Report. 
  72. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis.
  73. Ministerio de Economía de Argentina. (2022). Informe Estadístico Anual. Dirección de Información Energética de la Secretaría de Energía, Ministerio de Economía. 
  74. Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Crippa, M., Döbbeling, N., Forster, P. M., Guizzardi, D., Olivier, J., Peters, G. P., Pongratz, J., Reisinger, A., Rigby, M., Saunois, M., Smith, S. J., Solazzo, E., y Tian, H. (2021). A comprehensive and synthetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019. Earth System Science Data, 13(11), article 11. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5213-2021
  75. Morgan, R. K. (2012). Environmental impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
  76. Naciones Unidas. (2015). Acuerdo de París. https://www.un.org/es/climatechange/paris-agreement
  77. Naciones Unidas. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022 [Dataset]. División de Población, Departamento de Asuntos Económicos y Sociales. https://population.un.org/wpp/
  78. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2022). China Statistical Yearbook [Dataset]. 
  79. ND-GAIN. (2022). Ranking en el índice de adaptación para el cambio climático [Dataset]. https://gain.nd.edu/our-work/country-index/rankings/
  80. Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., Swette, B., Bezerra, T., DiGiano, M., Shimada, J., Seroa da Motta, R., Armijo, E., Castello, L., Brando, P., Hansen, M. C., McGrath-Horn, M., Carvalho, O., y Hess, L. (2014). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344(6188), article 6188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525
  81. NOAA. (2024). Global Land and Ocean Year-to-Date Average Temperature Anomalies [Dataset]. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/tavg/land_ocean/ytd/0/1850-2022
  82. OACI. (2022). Resolution A41-21: Consolidated statement of continuing ICAO policies and practices related to environmental protection—Climate change. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/Assembly/Resolution_A41-21_Climate_change.pdf
  83. OCDE. (2019). Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/global-material-resources-outlook-to-2060_9789264307452-en.html
  84. OCDE. (2023). Estadísticas tributarias en América Latina y el Caribe. OCDE, Inter-American Center of Tax Administrations, Inter-American Development Bank and Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/estadisticas-tributarias-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe-2023_5a7667d6-es
  85. OLADE. (2021). Sistema de Información Energética de Latinoamérica y el Caribe [Dataset]. Organización Latinoamericana de Energía. https://sielac.olade.org/WebForms/ Reportes/SistemaNumerico.aspx?ss=2
  86. OLADE. (2023). Matriz de balance energético [Dataset]. SieLac.
  87. OLADE. (2024a). Generación eléctrica por fuente [Dataset]. SieLac. https://sielac.olade.org/WebForms/Reportes/SistemaNumerico.aspx?ss=2
  88. OLADE. (2024b). Matriz de balance energético [Dataset]. SieLac. https://sielac.olade.org/WebForms/Reportes/SistemaNumerico.aspx?ss=2
  89. Paltsev, S., Morris, J., Kheshgi, H., y Herzog, H. (2021). Hard-to-Abate Sectors: The role of industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS) in emission mitigation. Applied Energy, 300, 117322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117322
  90. Perelmuter, N. (2023). No disponible. Documento no publicado. CAF.
  91. PNUD. (2022). ¿Qué son los mercados de carbono y por qué son importantes? PNUD Climate Promise. https://climatepromise.undp.org/es/news-and-stories/que-son-los-mercados-de-carbono-y-por-que-son-importantes
  92. PNUMA-CMVC y UICN. (2022). Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM) [Dataset]. ambridge, UK: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente, Centro Mundial de Vigilancia de la Conservación y Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza y los Recursos Naturales. http://www.protectedplanet.net
  93. POEA y PNUMA. (2019). Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2018. Programa de Observación y Evaluación del Ártico y Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente. https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/technical-background-report-for-the-global-mercury-assessment-2018/1815
  94. Pörtner, H.-O., Scholes, R. J., Agard, J., Archer, E., Arneth, A., Bai, X., Barnes, D., Burrows, M., Chan, L., Cheung, W. L. (William), Diamond, S., Donatti, C., Duarte, C., Eisenhauer, N., Foden, W., Gasalla, M. A., Handa, C., Hickler, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., … Ngo, H. (2021). IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop report on biodiversity and climate change [Info:eu-repo/semantics/report]. IPBES secretariat. 10.5281/zenodo.4659158
  95. Puig, J., y Tornarolli, L. (2023). Acceso y consumo de energía residencial en América Latina y el Caribe. Documento de trabajo. CAF.
  96. Purvis, A., Molnar, Z., Obura, D., Ichii, K., Willis, K., Chettri, N., Dulloo, E., Hendry, A., Gabrielyan, B., Gutt, J., Jacob, U., Keskin, E., Niamir, A., Öztürk, B., Salimov, R. and Jaureguiberry, P (2019). Chapter 2.2. Status and Trends – Nature. In: Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondízio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S., Ngo, H. T. (eds). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 108 pages DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3832005
  97. Reynaert, M., Souza-Rodrigues, E. A., y van Benthem, A. A. (2024). The Environmental Impacts of Protected Area Policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 107, 103968. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31873
  98. Rico-Straffon, J., Wang, Z., Panlasigui, S., Loucks, C. J., Swenson, J., y Pfaff, A. (2023). Forest concessions and eco-certifications in the Peruvian Amazon: Deforestation impacts of logging rights and logging restrictions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, 102780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102780
  99. Rico-Straffon, J., Wang, Z., y Pfaff, A. (2022). Comparing Protection Types in the Peruvian Amazon Multiple-Use Protected Areas Did No Worse for Forests. Documento de trabajo 2022/20. CAF.
  100. Rivera, N. M., Ruiz-Tagle, J. C., y Spiller, E. (2024). The health benefits of solar power generation: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 126, 102999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102999
  101. Roe, S., Streck, C., Beach, R., Busch, J., Chapman, M., Daioglou, V., Deppermann, A., Doelman, J., Emmet-Booth, J., Engelmann, J., Fricko, O., Frischmann, C., Funk, J., Grassi, G., Griscom, B., Havlik, P., Hanssen, S., Humpenöder, F., Landholm, D., … Lawrence, D. (2021). Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country. Global Change Biology, 27 (23), article 23. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15873
  102. Rudorff, B. F. T., Adami, M., Aguiar, D. A., Moreira, M. A., Mello, M. P., Fabiani, L., Amaral, D. F., y Pires, B. M. (2011). The Soy Moratorium in the Amazon Biome Monitored by Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing, 3(1), article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3010185
  103. Salzman, J., Bennett, G., Carroll, N., Goldstein, A., y Jenkins, M. (2018). The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability, 1(3), article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0
  104. Secretaría de la CMNUCC. (2023). Nationally Determined Contributions Registry. United Nations Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/ NDCREG?field_party_region_target_id=All&field_document_ca_target_.
  105. Sims, K. R. E., y Alix-Garcia, J. M. (2017). Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 86, 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.11.010
  106. Sociedad Zoológica de Londres y Fondo Mundial para la Naturaleza. (2022). Índice Planeta Vivo [Dataset]. https://www.livingplanetindex.org/
  107. Springborn, M. R., Weill, J. A., Lips, K. R., Ibáñez, R., y Ghosh, A. (2022). Amphibian collapses increased malaria incidence in Central America. Environmental Research Letters, 17(10), article 10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8e1d
  108. Terlouw, T., Bauer, C., Rosa, L., y Mazzotti, M. (2021). Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies: A critical review. Energy & Environmental Science, 14(4), article 4. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE03757E
  109. UNCTAD. (2024). Digital Economy Report 2024: Shaping an environmentally sustainable and inclusive digital future. Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo. https://unctad.org/publication/digital-economy-report-2024
  110. UNEP GBD. (2022). Marco Mundial de Biodiversidad de Kunming-Montreal. https://www.unep.org/es/resources/marco-mundial-de-biodiversidad-de-kunming-montreal.
  111. Valdiones, A. P., Bernasconi, P., Silgueiro, V., Guidotti, V., Miranda, F., Costa, J., Rajão, R., y Manzolli, B. (2021). Desmatamento Ilegal na Amazônia e no Matopiba: Falta transparência e acesso à informação. 
  112. Villalobos, L., Robalino, J., Sandoval, C., y Alpízar, F. (2023). Local Effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services on Rural Poverty. Environmental and Resource Economics, 84(3), article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00733-7
  113. Wilberforce, T., Olabi, A. G., Sayed, E. T., Elsaid, K., y Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021). Progress in carbon capture technologies. Science of The Total Environment, 761, 143203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143203
  114. Wunder, S., Engel, S., y Pagiola, S. (2008). Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4), article 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010